Muslims argue that the claim that Jesus is God, the second person in the Holy Trinity, is contradicted by several passages in the Bible itself. These passages highlight Jesus’ limitations in knowledge, power, and independence. For instance, Jesus admits his ignorance about the Day of Judgment (Mark 13:32, Matt. 24:36), his reliance on God for performing miracles (John 5:19, 30), and his prayerful dependence on God (John 20:17, Matt. 27:46, Luke 11:2-4, Matt. 26:36-39). Furthermore, the Bible states that God is an invisible spirit (John 1:18, John 5:37, John 4:24), while Jesus was seen and heard by many. Jesus also acknowledges the superiority of the Father (John 14:28, Luke 18:19, John 8:42, Luke 22:42, John 5:30). These scriptural accounts challenge the notion of Jesus’ divinity and support the view that he is distinct from the Supreme Being.
The claim that Jesus is God, the second person in the Holy Trinity, is a foundational belief in orthodox Christianity. To address the objections raised, we will consider the context and interpretation of key biblical passages and examine the theological principles underpinning the doctrine of the Trinity.
The Knowledge of Jesus and the Day of Judgment
Objection: Mark 13:32 and Matthew 24:36 state that Jesus did not know the day or hour of the judgment, implying a limitation on His knowledge and suggesting He is not omniscient like God.
Response: In Christian theology, the incarnation of Jesus (God becoming flesh) involves Him taking on human nature, including its limitations. Philippians 2:6-7 explains that Jesus, “though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men.” This self-emptying (kenosis) includes temporarily setting aside His divine privileges. The limitation of knowledge mentioned is consistent with Jesus’ fully human experience and does not negate His divinity. Moreover, the context of these passages shows Jesus’ submission to the Father’s will, aligning with the distinct roles within the Trinity.
The Source of Jesus’ Power
Objection: John 5:19 and John 5:30 indicate that Jesus claimed to have no power of His own, suggesting He is not all-powerful.
Response: Jesus’ statements about His reliance on the Father reflect the economic Trinity (the distinct roles of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in the work of creation and salvation) rather than ontological inferiority. In John 10:30, Jesus declares, “I and the Father are one,” affirming their unity in essence. The miracles of Jesus, performed through the Father’s authority, illustrate the harmony and cooperative work within the Trinity rather than a denial of His divinity.
Jesus’ Relationship with God
Objection: Jesus referred to God as His God (John 20:17) and prayed to God, suggesting He is not God Himself.
Response: Jesus’s relational language emphasizes His role within the Trinity and His mission as the incarnate Son. In His humanity, Jesus exemplifies perfect reliance on and communion with the Father, providing a model for believers. The distinction between the persons of the Trinity does not negate the unity of essence. The prayer of Jesus in John 17:21-22 reveals His desire for believers to share in His unity with the Father, pointing to the mystery of the Triune God.
Jesus as Visible and God as Invisible
Objection: John 1:18 and John 5:37 state that no one has seen God, whereas Jesus was seen by many, indicating He is not God.
Response: John 1:18 also states, “No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father’s side, he has made him known.” This underscores that Jesus, the incarnate Word, reveals God to humanity. Colossians 1:15 describes Jesus as “the image of the invisible God,” affirming that through Jesus, God’s nature and character are made manifest. The incarnation does not contradict God’s invisibility but reveals God’s desire to be known intimately by His creation.
Jesus’ Subordination to the Father
Objection: Passages like John 14:28 and John 5:30 suggest that Jesus is subordinate to the Father, indicating He is not equal to God.
Response: Jesus’ functional subordination to the Father pertains to His role in the redemption plan, not His essence. The Athanasian Creed articulates that the persons of the Trinity are “co-equal” and “co-eternal,” yet they operate in distinct roles. Jesus’ statements about the Father being greater refer to His incarnate mission and voluntary submission to the Father’s will, which does not diminish His divine nature.
Jesus as the Word Made Flesh
Objection: The previous objections argue against the divinity of Jesus based on His apparent limitations and distinctions from God.
Response: John 1:1-14 provides a foundational text for understanding Jesus as God made flesh: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God… And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth.” This passage unequivocally identifies Jesus (the Word) as God who took on human nature. The early church councils, such as the Council of Chalcedon (451 AD), affirmed the doctrine of the hypostatic union, which states that Jesus is fully God and fully man, two natures in one person.
Jesus’ Omniscience in Context
Objection: Mark 13:32 and Matthew 24:36 imply Jesus did not possess complete knowledge.
Response: The limitation of Jesus’ knowledge about the day of judgment must be understood within the context of His incarnation. In His earthly ministry, Jesus operated under the voluntary limitations of His human nature, as seen in Philippians 2:6-7. However, passages like John 21:17, where Peter acknowledges Jesus’ knowledge of all things, affirm His omniscience. Furthermore, post-resurrection, Jesus declares in Matthew 28:18, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me,” indicating His resumed divine prerogatives.
Jesus’ Miracles and Divine Authority
Objection: Jesus’ miracles were performed by the power of God, not His own.
Response: While Jesus attributes His miracles to the Father’s power, this is consistent with His role within the Trinity. The miracles serve to authenticate His divine mission and reveal the Kingdom of God. John 10:37-38 records Jesus saying, “If I am not doing the works of my Father, then do not believe me; but if I do them, even though you do not believe me, believe the works, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me and I am in the Father.” This demonstrates the inseparable unity and cooperation between Jesus and the Father.
Jesus’ Prayers and Worship
Objection: Jesus prayed to God, indicating He is not God.
Response: Jesus’ prayers highlight His genuine humanity and His exemplary relationship with the Father. The Gospels record instances where Jesus prays, not because He is separate from God, but to model dependence on the Father and to fulfill His role as the obedient Son. The prayer in Gethsemane (Matthew 26:39) shows His submission to the Father’s will, a critical aspect of the redemptive plan. Hebrews 5:7-9 explains that Jesus’ prayers and sufferings were part of His human experience, necessary for our salvation.
The Invisible God and Visible Jesus
Objection: Jesus was seen and heard, whereas God is described as invisible.
Response: John 1:18 and Colossians 1:15 reveal that Jesus makes the invisible God known to humanity. The incarnation does not contradict God’s invisibility but rather expresses God’s desire to reveal Himself in a tangible way. In John 14:9, Jesus says, “Whoever has seen me has seen the Father.” This statement underscores that Jesus is the visible manifestation of the invisible God, providing a unique and intimate revelation of God’s nature.
Jesus’ Subordination within the Trinity
Objection: Jesus’ statements of subordination imply He is not equal to God.
Response: The functional subordination within the Trinity is a matter of role, not essence. John 5:19-30 and John 14:28 reflect Jesus’ role in the divine economy, particularly His incarnate mission. The Nicene Creed (325 AD) articulates that Jesus is “of one substance with the Father,” affirming His co-equality while recognizing the distinct persons and roles within the Trinity. Jesus’ statements about the Father being greater pertain to His incarnate state and mission rather than His eternal divine nature.
Further Theological Insights
The Council of Nicaea and the Nicene Creed
The early church faced numerous challenges in articulating the relationship between Jesus and God the Father. The Council of Nicaea (325 AD) addressed these issues, resulting in the Nicene Creed, which states: “We believe in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, begotten from the Father before all ages, God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made; of the same essence as the Father.”
This creed underscores the belief in Jesus’ full divinity, co-eternity, and consubstantiality with the Father.
The Chalcedonian Definition
The Chalcedonian Definition (451 AD) further clarified Christ’s nature, stating: “We confess that one and the same Christ, Lord, and only begotten Son is to be acknowledged in two natures without confusion, change, division, or separation.”
This definition affirms that Jesus is fully God and fully man, perfectly united in one person.
Conclusion
The Christian doctrine of the Trinity asserts that God is one in essence and three in persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The objections are addressed by understanding the context and the theological implications of Jesus’ words and actions. The incarnation involves Jesus, fully God, taking on human nature to accomplish the work of salvation. This profound mystery is central to the Christian faith and is affirmed throughout the New Testament.
References:
- Athanasius of Alexandria. On the Incarnation. St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1996.
- Carson, D.A. The Gospel According to John. Eerdmans, 1991.
- Grudem, Wayne. Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine. Zondervan, 1994.
- Kelly, J.N.D. Early Christian Doctrines. A&C Black, 1978
- Packer, J.I. Knowing God. InterVarsity Press, 1993.
- Pelikan, Jaroslav. The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine, Vol. 1: The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition (100-600). University of Chicago Press, 1971.
- Wright, N.T. The Challenge of Jesus: Rediscovering Who Jesus Was and Is. InterVarsity Press, 1999.
English 
Arabic 
Spanish 
French 
Urdu 
Persian